PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 643 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 AF Alex Freeland SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.