PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 7%Cutter 7%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 AB Alec Burleson LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JW Jordan Walker RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 IH Iván Herrera RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JW JJ Wetherholt LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Wetherholt
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MW Masyn Winn RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masyn Winn
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NC Nathan Church LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JF José Fermín RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .275
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .226 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BJ Blaze Jordan RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Blaze Jordan
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-20 game page →