PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 JW Jordan Walker RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 AB Alec Burleson LHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 IH Iván Herrera RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JW JJ Wetherholt LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Wetherholt
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MW Masyn Winn RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masyn Winn
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NC Nathan Church LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JF José Fermín RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NG Nolan Gorman LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Gorman
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .277
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .226 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.