PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .352vs RHH xwOBA .316Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 43%Slider 32%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Cutter 7%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 WC William Contreras RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BT Brice Turang LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 SF Sal Frelick LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DH David Hamilton LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CY Christian Yelich LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jackson Chourio RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-22 game page →