PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CY Christian Yelich LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DH David Hamilton LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 537 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.