PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .343vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 32%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Cutter 7%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .227 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.