PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .352vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 576 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 510 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.