PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 690 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 540 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JJ Jim Jarvis LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jim Jarvis
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SM Sean Murphy RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sean Murphy
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.