PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 670 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Dominic Smith LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-24 game page →