PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .343vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 32%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Cutter 7%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JH Jonah Heim SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HB Henry Bolte RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-04 game page →