PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Basso vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Basso's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Basso's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .243vs RHH xwOBA .362Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Cutter 24%Curveball 18%Changeup 7%Sinker 3%Slider 2%Unknown 1%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Basso, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 JB Josh Bell SH .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 BL Brooks Lee SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 RL Royce Lewis RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 VC Victor Caratini SH .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RK Ryan Kreidler RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Kreidler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.