PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Basso vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Basso's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Basso's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .298vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Curveball 19%Cutter 16%Slider 8%Sinker 6%Changeup 5%Unknown 1%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Basso, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 474 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 VC Victor Caratini SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.