PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Basso vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Basso's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Basso's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .305vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Curveball 18%Cutter 16%Slider 7%Changeup 6%Sinker 6%Unknown 1%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Basso, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 BB Byron Buxton RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Byron Buxton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 VC Victor Caratini SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AM Austin Martin RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.