PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Basso vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Basso's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Basso's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .261vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Curveball 19%Cutter 17%Slider 8%Changeup 5%Sinker 5%Unknown 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Basso, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 634 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-01 game page →