PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Basso vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Basso's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Basso's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .293vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Curveball 19%Cutter 16%Slider 8%Sinker 6%Changeup 5%Unknown 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Basso, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .370
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 MS Myles Straw RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AK Alejandro Kirk RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Kirk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-09 game page →