PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Basso vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Basso's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Basso's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Curveball 18%Cutter 16%Slider 7%Changeup 6%Sinker 6%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Basso, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-22 game page →