PITCHER MATCHUP

Anthony Kay vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Anthony Kay's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Anthony Kay's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .273vs RHH xwOBA .395Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Sweeper 20%Cutter 19%Sinker 18%Changeup 14%Slider 3%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Anthony Kay, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AF Alex Freeland SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.