PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .285vs RHH xwOBA .329Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 572 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 506 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AJ Aaron Judge RHB .391
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Aaron Judge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .426 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .414 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .441 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.