PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .272vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sweeper 19%Changeup 18%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 498 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BR Ben Rice LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AR Amed Rosario RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JE J.C. Escarra LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.C. Escarra
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Anthony Volpe RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Anthony Volpe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-20 game page →