PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .271vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sweeper 19%Changeup 18%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC José Caballero RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 480 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JD Jasson Domínguez SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jasson Domínguez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.