PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .412 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.