PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.