PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .269vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 19%Changeup 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-13 game page →