PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .281vs RHH xwOBA .330Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 562 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brandon Lowe SH .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jake Mangum SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RO Ryan O'Hearn LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan O'Hearn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OC Oneil Cruz LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oneil Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JT Jared Triolo RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 KG Konnor Griffin RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Konnor Griffin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.