PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .375
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 516 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BS Bryson Stott LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 582 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.