PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .268vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 19%Changeup 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 671 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 466 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 572 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BH Bryce Harper LHB .377
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.