PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .274vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sweeper 19%Changeup 18%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .380
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-07 game page →