PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .269vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 19%Changeup 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT José Tena LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BH Brady House RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.