PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .281vs RHH xwOBA .330Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.