PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .285vs RHH xwOBA .329Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 620 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 489 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-16 game page →