PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .272vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sweeper 19%Changeup 18%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .423 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 489 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .271
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LG Lourdes Gurriel Jr. RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lourdes Gurriel Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.