PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .285vs RHH xwOBA .329Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 635 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.