PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 658 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.