PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .271vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sweeper 19%Changeup 18%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.