PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 581 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 411 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.