PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .266vs RHH xwOBA .329Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sweeper 19%Changeup 18%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 WC William Contreras RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BT Brice Turang LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 489 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 SF Sal Frelick LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JC Jackson Chourio RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CY Christian Yelich LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-01 game page →