PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .269vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 19%Changeup 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 475 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 376 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.