PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .281vs RHH xwOBA .330Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Changeup 19%Sweeper 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.