PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Abbott vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Abbott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Abbott's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .271vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 19%Changeup 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 3%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Abbott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HB Henry Bolte RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-06 game page →