PITCHER MATCHUP

Andre Pallante vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andre Pallante's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andre Pallante's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 28%Sinker 16%Knuckle Curve 16%Splitter 1%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andre Pallante, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WC Willi Castro SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-04 game page →