PITCHER MATCHUP

Andre Pallante vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andre Pallante's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andre Pallante's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .315vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 28%Sinker 16%Knuckle Curve 16%Splitter 1%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andre Pallante, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 599 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TF TJ Friedl LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 EA Edwin Arroyo SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edwin Arroyo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.