PITCHER MATCHUP

Andre Pallante vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andre Pallante's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andre Pallante's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .317vs RHH xwOBA .301Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 28%Sinker 16%Knuckle Curve 15%Splitter 1%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andre Pallante, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SS Spencer Steer RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Steer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JB JJ Bleday LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 TF TJ Friedl LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-25 game page →