PITCHER MATCHUP

Andre Pallante vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andre Pallante's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andre Pallante's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .315vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 28%Sinker 16%Knuckle Curve 15%Splitter 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andre Pallante, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 656 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .374
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .424 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .441 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 385 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-11 game page →