PITCHER MATCHUP

Andre Pallante vs San Diego Padres

How the San Diego Padres's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andre Pallante's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andre Pallante's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .315vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Slider 28%Sinker 16%Knuckle Curve 15%Splitter 1%

How the San Diego Padres's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Diego Padres's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andre Pallante, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 FT Fernando Tatis Jr. RHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Fernando Tatis Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jackson Merrill LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Merrill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Manny Machado RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Manny Machado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 513 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 XB Xander Bogaerts RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xander Bogaerts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JC Jake Cronenworth LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Cronenworth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 529 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FF Freddy Fermin RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddy Fermin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LC Luis Campusano RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Campusano
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SS Sung-Mun Song LHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sung-Mun Song
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  9. 9 ST Samad Taylor SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samad Taylor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.