PITCHER MATCHUP

Andre Pallante vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andre Pallante's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andre Pallante's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .315vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 28%Sinker 16%Knuckle Curve 15%Splitter 1%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andre Pallante, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OC Owen Caissie LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JM Joe Mack LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GC Griffin Conine LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.