PITCHER MATCHUP

Andre Pallante vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andre Pallante's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andre Pallante's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .315vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 28%Sinker 16%Knuckle Curve 16%Splitter 1%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andre Pallante, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 618 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .229 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-09 game page →