PREVIEW Starts 10:10 PM ET · UNIQLO Field at Dodger Stadium
September 22, 2026 · NL West

San Diego Padres at Los Angeles Dodgers

September 22, 202610:10 PM ETUNIQLO Field at Dodger Stadium
AWAY
San Diego Padres
87-69
@
HOME
Los Angeles Dodgers
96-60

Probable starters

AWAY · SD
HOME
TBD

Lineups

Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.

Hitter season stats

Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.

AWAY · SD Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Fernando Tatis Jr. RF · R .285 .355 .468 .823 25 81 126 .756
2 Jackson Merrill CF · L .255 .304 .445 .749 26 86 155 .765
3 Manny Machado 3B · R .219 .307 .406 .713 28 84 138 .733
4 Xander Bogaerts SS · R .229 .328 .339 .667 12 56 106 .715
5 Ty France 1B · R .301 .366 .519 .885 21 70 100 .703
6 Jake Cronenworth 2B · L .229 .310 .327 .637 7 36 90 .714
7 Freddy Fermin C · R .194 .268 .304 .572 4 20 55 .708
8 Luis Campusano C · R .263 .363 .439 .802 8 29 52 .726
9 Samad Taylor LF · R .343 .417 .445 .862 2 18 40 .721
HOME · LAD Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Freddie Freeman 1B · L .292 .367 .438 .805 16 67 110 .760
2 Kyle Tucker RF · L .234 .334 .393 .727 17 70 102 .767
3 Max Muncy 3B · L .256 .352 .500 .852 29 76 136 .730
4 Mookie Betts SS · R .259 .325 .454 .779 22 67 54 .749
5 Teoscar Hernández LF · R .266 .335 .423 .758 15 63 127 .728
6 Tommy Edman 2B · S .245 .328 .376 .704 7 38 63 .708
7 Alex Freeland 2B · S .234 .327 .325 .652 4 21 74 .734
8 Will Smith C · R .248 .342 .410 .752 9 33 41 .743
9 Miguel Rojas 2B · R .271 .311 .399 .710 4 22 26 .697

Pitcher vs. lineup projection

Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.

SD starter vs Dodgers lineup

Michael King (RHP)

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 627 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Michael King vs Dodgers: full season matchup breakdown →

Manager comparison

AWAY · SD
Craig Stammen
Lineup 2.3 R Bunts 3.1 R IBBs 3.1 R
HOME · LAD
Dave Roberts
Lineup 2.1 R Bunts 1.5 R IBBs 6.3 R

Bullpen availability

AWAY · SD
  • Available 8
  • Limited 0
  • Rest required 0
  • Inactive 0
HOME · LAD
  • Available 4
  • Limited 3
  • Rest required 0
  • Inactive 1

Recent form

AWAY · SD
9-1 W5 +24 run diff
WWWWWLWWWW
HOME · LAD
7-3 W4 +24 run diff
WWWWLWWLLW

Pitching & bullpen preview

Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Padres and Dodgers staffs going in.

Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.

Keep reading

How RunsLeft analyzes games

Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.

Read the full methodology.