ARCHIVE August 1, 2026
August 1, 2026 · AL East

Chicago White Sox vs Tampa Bay Rays

August 1, 2026Tropicana FieldDome 72°F · 0 mph, None
AWAY
Chicago White Sox
58-52
0
vs
HOME
Tampa Bay Rays
65-45
1

Game Highlights

Published August 1, 2026 · Source: MLB

Scoring summary

INN BATTER PLAY SCORE
B5 Nick Fortes Nick Fortes singles on a line drive to left fielder Sam Antonacci. Jonny DeLuca scores. CWS 0, TB 1

Box score

  123456789 R
CWS 000000000 0
TB 000010000 1

Pitching & bullpen

How the game was pitched — the starters, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role, and the pitch counts behind them.

White Sox AWAY 0

White Sox opened with Jordan Hicks, then turned the bulk of the game over to Noah Schultz.

workload · innings pitched
  • Jordan Hicks Opener 1.0 8 0 1
    Pitch-by-pitch: what Jordan Hicks threw
    CSW 50% 1st-pitch strike 100% 2.7 pitches/PA
    Pitch#%WhiffCSFoulBallIn play
    Sinker 3 38% 0 2 0 0 1
    Sweeper 3 38% 1 1 0 1 0
    Four-Seam Fastball 2 25% 0 0 1 0 1
  • Noah Schultz Bulk 5.0 67 1 4 L
  • Seranthony Domínguez Reliever 1.0 14 0 2
  • Trevor Richards Middle 1.0 17 0 1
Rays HOME 1

Drew Rasmussen started for Rays, leaving with a 1–0 lead.

workload · innings pitched
  • Drew Rasmussen Starter 6.0 96 0 10 W
    Pitch-by-pitch: what Drew Rasmussen threw
    CSW 34% 1st-pitch strike 55% 4.4 pitches/PA
    Pitch#%WhiffCSFoulBallIn play
    Four-Seam Fastball 38 40% 10 5 9 9 5
    Cutter 25 26% 4 5 2 13 1
    Sinker 24 25% 0 7 8 5 4
    Changeup 8 8% 2 0 1 4 1
    Sweeper 1 1% 0 0 0 1 0
  • Cam Booser Setup 0.2 16 0 2 HLD
  • Kevin Kelly Setup 1.0 12 0 2 HLD inherited 1, stranded 1
  • Garrett Cleavinger Setup 0.1 6 0 1 HLD
  • Bryan Baker Closer 1.0 6 0 1 SV

Where the game turned

1 run Bottom 5th · off Schultz
  • Fortes 1B (1)

Batting lines

AWAY · CWS
BATTER ABRHRBIBBK AVGOBPSLGOPS NOTES
Sam Antonacci LF 3 0 0 0 1 2 .279 .369 .413 .782
Munetaka Murakami 1B 4 0 1 0 0 3 .244 .380 .549 .929
Miguel Vargas 3B 4 0 0 0 0 2 .238 .343 .475 .818
Colson Montgomery SS 4 0 0 0 0 2 .215 .295 .450 .745
Randal Grichuk DH 2 0 1 0 0 1 .259 .293 .519 .812
Braden Montgomery RF 3 0 1 0 0 2 .239 .315 .384 .699
Everson Pereira CF 1 0 0 0 0 1 .211 .274 .382 .656
Chase Meidroth 2B 3 0 0 0 0 1 .270 .344 .389 .733
Edgar Quero C 3 0 2 0 0 0 .194 .257 .235 .492
Andrew Benintendi DH 2 0 0 0 0 2 .246 .308 .425 .733
Tristan Peters CF 2 0 0 0 0 0 .266 .323 .418 .741
HOME · TB
BATTER ABRHRBIBBK AVGOBPSLGOPS NOTES
Chandler Simpson LF 3 0 1 0 0 0 .290 .323 .351 .674
Junior Caminero 3B 3 0 0 0 0 2 .280 .372 .545 .917
Victor Mesa Jr. RF 3 0 0 0 0 1 .211 .295 .423 .718
Jonny DeLuca CF 3 1 1 0 0 1 .263 .298 .439 .737 SB
Ryan Vilade 1B 3 0 0 0 0 3 .252 .313 .472 .785
Ben Williamson 2B 3 0 0 0 0 0 .248 .312 .324 .636
Nick Fortes C 3 0 1 1 0 0 .277 .316 .382 .698
Taylor Walls SS 3 0 0 0 0 1 .212 .302 .281 .583
Yandy Díaz DH 4 0 2 0 0 0 .304 .378 .465 .843

Pitching lines

AWAY · CWS
PITCHER IPHRERBBKHR NPERA DEC
Jordan Hicks 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 3.09
Noah Schultz 5.0 3 1 1 0 4 0 67 5.82 L
Seranthony Domínguez 1.0 0 0 0 0 2 0 14 3.99
Trevor Richards 1.0 2 0 0 0 1 0 17 3.40
HOME · TB
PITCHER IPHRERBBKHR NPERA DEC
Drew Rasmussen 6.0 4 0 0 1 10 0 96 2.91 W
Cam Booser 0.2 1 0 0 0 2 0 16 2.05 HLD
Kevin Kelly 1.0 0 0 0 0 2 0 12 2.13 HLD
Garrett Cleavinger 0.1 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 3.27 HLD
Bryan Baker 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 1.45 SV

Manager comparison

AWAY · CWS
Will Venable
Lineup 5.0 R Bunts 3.1 R IBBs 2.0 R
HOME · TB
Kevin Cash
Lineup 2.2 R Bunts 3.7 R IBBs 3.5 R

Recent form

AWAY · CWS
4-6 L3 -8 run diff
LLLWLWWWLL
HOME · TB
7-3 W3 +0 run diff
WWWLWLWWLW

Season series: 2-1 with CWS listed first across 3 prior meetings.

Keep reading

How RunsLeft analyzes games

Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.

Read the full methodology.