June 24, 2026 · NL West
Oakland Athletics at San Francisco Giants
@
Probable starters
AWAY · ATH
HOME · SF
Lineups
Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.
Pitcher vs. lineup projection
Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.
ATH starter vs Giants lineup
Gage Jump (LHP)
Lineup avg xwOBA .318
-
1 WA Willy Adames RHB .312
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (9% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 RD Rafael Devers LHB .338
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (24% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 LA Luis Arraez LHB .307
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 616 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
4 MC Matt Chapman RHB .306
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .322
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
6 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .317
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .306
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .352
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .306
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
SF starter vs Athletics lineup
Tyler Mahle (RHP)
Lineup avg xwOBA .318
-
1 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .325
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
- Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (26% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
2 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .362
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
- Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Splitter (26% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .321
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
- Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Splitter (26% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .297
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
- Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (26% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .285
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
- Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Splitter (26% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (10% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
6 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .309
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
- Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (26% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .318
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
- Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (10% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
8 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .329
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
- Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 MM Max Muncy RHB .313
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
- Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (26% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Manager comparison
AWAY · ATH
Lineup 3.3 R
Bunts 1.3 R
IBBs 1.6 R
HOME · SF
Lineup 1.7 R
Bunts 1.6 R
IBBs 1.8 R
Bullpen availability
AWAY · ATH
- Available 8
- Limited 1
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
HOME · SF
- Available 8
- Limited 0
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
Recent form
AWAY · ATH
5-5
L2
-13 run diff
LLWWLLWLWW
HOME · SF
4-5
L3
+2 run diff
LLL?WWWWLL
Pitching & bullpen preview
Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Athletics and Giants staffs going in.
Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.
Keep reading
How RunsLeft analyzes games
Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.