PITCHER MATCHUP

Zebby Matthews vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zebby Matthews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zebby Matthews's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .360vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 23%Cutter 13%Changeup 11%Curveball 9%Sinker 4%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zebby Matthews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .368
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .414 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JC José Caballero RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 489 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.