PITCHER MATCHUP

Zebby Matthews vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zebby Matthews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zebby Matthews's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Slider 24%Cutter 13%Changeup 12%Curveball 9%Sinker 4%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zebby Matthews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CK Christian Koss RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Jonah Cox RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-21 game page →