PITCHER MATCHUP

Zebby Matthews vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zebby Matthews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zebby Matthews's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .296Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Slider 24%Cutter 13%Changeup 11%Curveball 9%Sinker 4%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zebby Matthews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .425 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 AF Alex Freeland SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-22 game page →