PITCHER MATCHUP

Zebby Matthews vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zebby Matthews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zebby Matthews's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Slider 24%Cutter 13%Changeup 12%Curveball 9%Sinker 4%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zebby Matthews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 627 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.