PITCHER MATCHUP

Zebby Matthews vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zebby Matthews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zebby Matthews's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .360vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 23%Cutter 13%Changeup 11%Curveball 9%Sinker 4%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zebby Matthews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 466 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 574 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 469 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TE Tommy Edman SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.