PITCHER MATCHUP

Zebby Matthews vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zebby Matthews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zebby Matthews's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .360vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 23%Cutter 13%Changeup 11%Curveball 9%Sinker 4%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zebby Matthews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 473 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-07 game page →