PITCHER MATCHUP

Zebby Matthews vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zebby Matthews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zebby Matthews's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Slider 24%Cutter 13%Changeup 12%Curveball 9%Sinker 4%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zebby Matthews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 408 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.