PITCHER MATCHUP

Zebby Matthews vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zebby Matthews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zebby Matthews's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .362vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 24%Cutter 13%Changeup 11%Curveball 9%Sinker 4%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zebby Matthews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.