PITCHER MATCHUP

Zebby Matthews vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zebby Matthews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zebby Matthews's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .364vs RHH xwOBA .298Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 23%Cutter 14%Changeup 11%Curveball 9%Sinker 4%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zebby Matthews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 408 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-10 game page →