PITCHER MATCHUP

Zack Wheeler vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zack Wheeler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zack Wheeler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .274vs RHH xwOBA .222Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Sinker 17%Sweeper 14%Splitter 11%Cutter 10%Curveball 9%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zack Wheeler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 563 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .420 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-21 game page →