PITCHER MATCHUP

Zack Wheeler vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zack Wheeler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zack Wheeler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .227Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Sinker 17%Sweeper 14%Splitter 12%Cutter 10%Curveball 9%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zack Wheeler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (12% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CY Christian Yelich LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (12% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DH David Hamilton LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (12% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 537 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.