PITCHER MATCHUP

Zack Littell vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zack Littell's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zack Littell's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .354vs RHH xwOBA .330Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 29%Four-Seam Fastball 25%Splitter 24%Sinker 15%Sweeper 7%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zack Littell, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .433 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-23 game page →