PITCHER MATCHUP

Zack Littell vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zack Littell's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zack Littell's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .366vs RHH xwOBA .332Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 29%Splitter 25%Four-Seam Fastball 24%Sinker 15%Sweeper 7%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zack Littell, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 711 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 609 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .437 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 571 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 477 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.