PITCHER MATCHUP

Zack Littell vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zack Littell's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zack Littell's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .354vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 29%Four-Seam Fastball 24%Splitter 24%Sinker 15%Sweeper 7%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zack Littell, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 653 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 557 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .434 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (24% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.