PITCHER MATCHUP

Zack Littell vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zack Littell's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zack Littell's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .366vs RHH xwOBA .332Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 29%Splitter 25%Four-Seam Fastball 24%Sinker 15%Sweeper 7%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zack Littell, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 628 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 582 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .227 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (25% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.