PITCHER MATCHUP

Zach Agnos vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zach Agnos's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zach Agnos's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .366Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 27%Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sweeper 16%Splitter 13%Sinker 10%Slider 9%Unknown 1%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zach Agnos, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Cutter (27% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 637 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Cutter (27% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Cutter (27% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Cutter (27% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Cutter (27% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Cutter (27% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LT Lane Thomas RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lane Thomas
    • Cutter (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Cutter (27% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Cutter (27% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.