PITCHER MATCHUP

Zac Gallen vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zac Gallen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zac Gallen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Knuckle Curve 22%Changeup 16%Slider 15%Sinker 3%Cutter 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zac Gallen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 557 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .439 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 370 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-12 game page →