PITCHER MATCHUP

Zac Gallen vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Zac Gallen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Zac Gallen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Knuckle Curve 22%Changeup 16%Slider 15%Sinker 3%Cutter 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Zac Gallen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 594 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .426 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .228 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.