PITCHER MATCHUP

Yoshinobu Yamamoto vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Yoshinobu Yamamoto's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Yoshinobu Yamamoto's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .258vs RHH xwOBA .273Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Splitter 26%Curveball 16%Cutter 13%Sinker 10%Slider 5%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Yoshinobu Yamamoto, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 569 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brandon Lowe SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jake Mangum SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RO Ryan O'Hearn LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan O'Hearn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 OC Oneil Cruz LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oneil Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT Jared Triolo RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 KG Konnor Griffin RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Konnor Griffin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.