PITCHER MATCHUP

Yoshinobu Yamamoto vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Yoshinobu Yamamoto's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Yoshinobu Yamamoto's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .270vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Splitter 26%Curveball 17%Cutter 12%Sinker 9%Slider 5%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Yoshinobu Yamamoto, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .416 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 572 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 LG Lourdes Gurriel Jr. RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lourdes Gurriel Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TT Tommy Troy RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Troy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-11 game page →