PITCHER MATCHUP

Yoshinobu Yamamoto vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Yoshinobu Yamamoto's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Yoshinobu Yamamoto's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .262vs RHH xwOBA .273Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Splitter 26%Curveball 16%Cutter 13%Sinker 10%Slider 5%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Yoshinobu Yamamoto, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.