PITCHER MATCHUP

Yoshinobu Yamamoto vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Yoshinobu Yamamoto's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Yoshinobu Yamamoto's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .265vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Splitter 26%Curveball 16%Cutter 13%Sinker 10%Slider 5%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Yoshinobu Yamamoto, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-14 game page →