PITCHER MATCHUP

Yoshinobu Yamamoto vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Yoshinobu Yamamoto's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Yoshinobu Yamamoto's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .258vs RHH xwOBA .273Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Splitter 26%Curveball 16%Cutter 13%Sinker 10%Slider 5%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Yoshinobu Yamamoto, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.