PITCHER MATCHUP

Yohan Ramírez vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Yohan Ramírez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Yohan Ramírez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .290Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 31%Four-Seam Fastball 29%Sinker 21%Curveball 15%Unknown 2%Slider 1%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Yohan Ramírez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TF TJ Friedl LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DM Dane Myers RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-30 game page →