PITCHER MATCHUP

Will Warren vs Boston Red Sox

How the Boston Red Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Will Warren's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Will Warren's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Sinker 23%Sweeper 21%Changeup 12%Curveball 6%

How the Boston Red Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Boston Red Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Will Warren, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 WA Wilyer Abreu LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wilyer Abreu
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 513 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JD Jarren Duran LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jarren Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 645 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CR Ceddanne Rafaela RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ceddanne Rafaela
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Caleb Durbin RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Caleb Durbin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WC Willson Contreras RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willson Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AR Adley Rutschman SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adley Rutschman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Andruw Monasterio RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andruw Monasterio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CM Curtis Mead RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MY Masataka Yoshida LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masataka Yoshida
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.