PITCHER MATCHUP

Will Warren vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Will Warren's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Will Warren's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Sinker 23%Sweeper 21%Changeup 12%Curveball 6%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Will Warren, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 658 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.