PITCHER MATCHUP

Will Klein vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Will Klein's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Will Klein's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .276vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 52%Sweeper 21%Curveball 18%Slider 5%Cutter 4%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Will Klein, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Ben Rice LHB .372
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .420 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 474 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .271
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 474 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AW Austin Wells LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.