PITCHER MATCHUP

Will Klein vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Will Klein's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Will Klein's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .274vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 53%Sweeper 22%Curveball 17%Slider 5%Cutter 4%Unknown 1%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Will Klein, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 VC Victor Caratini SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .420 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RK Ryan Kreidler RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Kreidler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.