PITCHER MATCHUP

Will Klein vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Will Klein's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Will Klein's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .274vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 53%Sweeper 22%Curveball 17%Slider 5%Cutter 4%Unknown 1%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Will Klein, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 489 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RL Royce Lewis RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VC Victor Caratini SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .419 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.