PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.