PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .329vs RHH xwOBA .322Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Curveball 19%Splitter 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 598 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.