PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 656 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JP Joc Pederson LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 EC Evan Carter LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CS Corey Seager LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.