PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .314vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 29%Sweeper 24%Curveball 20%Splitter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 10%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 558 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JJ Josh Jung RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB Jake Burger RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 KH Kyle Higashioka RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Higashioka
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-22 game page →