PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .307vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 30%Sweeper 24%Curveball 20%Splitter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .424 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-16 game page →