PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .331vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Curveball 19%Splitter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 449 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 AB Alec Bohm RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .431 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.