PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 719 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .430 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.