PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .337vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 703 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .434 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .413 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 496 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.