PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .337vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 614 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .372
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .473 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.