PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .331vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Curveball 19%Splitter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BB Brett Baty LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .231 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .231 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 FL Francisco Lindor SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 555 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 LT Luis Torrens RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Torrens
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-01 game page →