PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 534 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 638 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .370
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .467 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.